Sunday 31 July 2011

KNOWING and KNOWLEDGE


The more the mind knows, the less it becomes capable of knowing; knowledge is the only hindrance
towards knowing. Knowing is something quite different from knowledge. Knowledge means
thoughts, and knowledge means borrowed learning. Knowing means a mind which is unburdened of
everything that is known; a mind in the state of knowing is simply ignorant – it doesn’t know anything,
it is humble. And to be humble, one has to unlearn what has become a burden.
The known must cease for the unknown to be. And life is unknown, and truth is unknown, yet we
are all burdened with knowledge. This attitude of knowledge becomes a hindrance towards the void,
which goes into the unchartered, into the unknown, the unacquainted, the unlearnt.
So to me there is nothing to be preached or to be taught – I am not a teacher in that sense. Rather,
I am awakened – not a teacher. And the first awakening that is required today is the awakening of
the humble attitude of an unlearnt, unknowledgeable mind, a mind that is open and not closed.

There are things which can be known by others; information can be imparted. As far as science is
concerned – the complete knowledge known as scientific knowledge – there are things that can be
imparted. Then there is the possibility of a school, of a teacher, of a mission.... But there are things
as far as the inner is concerned... as far as the divine is concerned, and these things cannot be
made part and parcel of a dead knowledge. They cannot be condensed into maxims, nor is there
any possibility for any objective experimentation or for a laboratory where more than one person
can experiment and come to a conclusion. There is no such possibility. The inner, the divine, is
basically individual, is basically subjective. One knows, but cannot impart the knowledge to others.
One knows and lives.... Others may feel the perfume, may feel the scent, may feel the song, may
feel the unknown presence, but that too is intuitive, that too is indirect.

Monday 25 July 2011

Truth cannot be taught.


Truth cannot be taught... but it can be learned. And between these two sentences is the key of all
understanding. So let me repeat: truth cannot be taught, but it can be learned – because truth is
not a teaching, not a doctrine, not a theory, a philosophy, or something like that. Truth is existence.
Truth is BEING. Nothing can be said about it.
If you start saying something about it you will go round and round. You will beat around the bush,
but you will never reach the center of it. Once you ask a question ABOUT you are already on the
path of missing it. It can be encountered directly, but not through about. There is no VIA MEDIA.
Truth is here and now. Only truth is. Nothing else exists. So the moment you raise a question about
it the mind has already moved away. You are somewhere else, not here and now.
Truth cannot be taught because words cannot convey it. Words are impotent. Truth is vast,
tremendously vast, infinite. Words are very very narrow. You cannot force truth into words, it is
impossible. And how is one going to teach without words?

Silence can be a message. It can convey, it can become the vehicle. But then the question is not of
the master’s concern to teach it. The question is of the disciple’s to learn it.
If it was a question of teaching, then the master would do something.
But words are useless – nothing can be done with them. The master can remain silent and can
give the message from every pore of his being – but now the disciple has to understand it. Unaided,
without any help from the master, the disciple has to receive it.
That’s why in the world of religion teachers don’t exist, only masters. A teacher is one who teaches,
a master is one who IS. A teacher is one who talks about the truth, a master is truth himself. You
can learn, but he cannot teach.
He can be there, open, available – you have to drink him, and you have to eat him. You have to
imbibe him. You have to become pregnant with him. You have to absorb.
A master is one who has become the truth and is available for all those who are ready to absorb
him; hence Jesus says to his disciples: Eat me. Truth can be eaten; it cannot be taught. You can
allow it to reach you, but it cannot be forced on you.
Truth is absolutely nonviolent, it will not even knock at your door – even that much will be too much
aggression.
If you allow, if you are receptive, it is all there. If you are closed, if you are not receptive, for millions
of lives you may search for it and you will go on missing it. And it has always been there, it has
always been the case. Not even a single step was needed. Not even the opening of the eyes was
needed. Not even a single movement towards it was needed. It was already there: you had to be
receptive.
Truth cannot be taught, but still, you can learn it. So the whole art depends on how to become a
disciple.
Humanity is divided in three parts. One part, the major part, almost ninety-nine percent, never
bothers about truth. It remains oblivious. It is completely asleep. It has no inquir y. It lives a
somnambulistic life. The question of, What is truth? never arises. This is the greater part of
humanity.
They live in ignorance, completely unaware that they are ignorant, not only unaware that they are
ignorant – they may be thinking and dreaming that they know.
In fact this is part of their sleep, that they think they know. And what is the need to learn? To
DESTROY the need to learn, this is the best thing to do: to go on feeling that you already know.
Then there is no question of learning, no need to become a disciple. You are satisfied, in your grave.
You are dead.
This is the greater part of humanity. Even if you approach people of this fragment and tell them
about truth, they will laugh. They will say you are talking nonsense. Not only that, they will deny that

there is anything like truth or God or nirvana. If you give them the message of an enlightened being
they will say there never existed such a being, and he cannot exist: ”We are the whole of humanity.”

Somebody asked Voltaire about the origin of religion, and Voltaire is reported to have said, ”Religion
was born when the first charlatan met the first fool on the earth.” In the encounter of the charlatan
and the fool, religion was born. This has an element of truth in it. It is true in a sense, but it is true
not about religion, but about pseudo-religion.

religion
is born between a master and a disciple. Religion is born between a being who has attained and a
being who is authentically in search to attain it. Religion is born between truth and a disciple.

But the first part of humanity remains completely unaware, blissfully unaware, because when there
is no inquiry, no search, they live a comfortable life of no effort. They go on falling down. They never
rise high, they never reach the peaks. And they don’t know. They not only don’t know, they never
dream that there are peaks of experience, heights of ecstasies.
They remain almost like animals: eating, sleeping – and confined to such things. A life of routine,
moving like a wheel; they are born, they live, they give bi th to others, and they die. And the wheel
goes on moving: they are born again, the same thing is repeated again and again, ad nauseam.


Then there is the second part of humanity: a few, who inquire. But they don’t know how to learn.
They search, but they don’t understand that this search needs an inner transformation, only then it
becomes possible. An inner mutation is needed.

In this dimension, learning is not like other learnings. You can learn chemistry, physics, mathematics,
without any change in your consciousness. There is no need to change your consciousness; as you
are, you can learn. But religion is a learning in which a basic requirement is: First change your
consciousness.
Even before the learning starts you have to be prepared for it. A long preparation is needed,
otherwise learning cannot start.
The second part inquires, but is not ready, so it goes on round and round in theories, hypotheses,
human mental projections, inventions of articulate people, verbalizations, philosophies, metaphysics
– there are thousands of theories available for this type of person.

He can choose – the market is vast, and he can go on changing from one theory to another, because
no theory can give you the right thing. Theories can’t give, so you get fed up with one theory, then
you choose another ; you get fed up with one teacher, then you move to another teacher – and
people go on, they become wanderers

 they have
been to that, they have been to this teacher and to that, and they have been moving from one to
another : nothing satisfies. But they are not aware that it is not a question of the teacher, it is the
basic preparation that they are lacking. They are not yet ready to be disciples, and if you are not
ready to be a disciple, how can you find the master? Tradition has it that when the disciple is ready

the master appears on his own accord. You need not even search for him, he will come. Whenever
a disciple is ready, the master will appear immediately. You go on searching for him, and he never
appears. Something is wrong within you. Something within you frustrates the whole effort. You are
not ready.
You cannot meet a master on your conditions, you have to fulfill HIS conditions. And they are eternal,
they have never changed, they remain the same. One has to learn how to be a disciple.
This second part of humanity becomes a wandering mass of inquirers. They never gain much. They
become rolling stones, which never gather any moss. They move on... rolling.

That third part is those who seek, who inquire; but the inquiry is not intellectual, the inquiry is total.
The inquiry is not like learning any other subject; the inquiry is so total that they are ready to die for
it, they are ready to change their whole being for it. They are ready to fulfill all conditions. Even if
death is a condition, they are ready to die. But they want to learn what truth is, they want to be in the
world of truth; they don’t want to live in the world of lies and illusions and dreams and projections.
This third type can become a disciple. And only this third type, when they have attained, can become
masters.
That’s why I say truth cannot be taught but it can be learned. But then the whole thing depends on
you.
A master exists – you have to be in the presence of the master completely empty of yourself. That is
the meaning of death. A disciple comes and dies before the master. That’s what surrender means.

He comes and leaves himself outside the door. Where he leaves his shoes, he leaves himself there
also. He comes to the master completely empty. In that very emptiness, truth is possible. In that
very emptiness the master star ts flowing. The master becomes like a tremendous waterfall, falling
into the valley of the disciple. From his peaks of being he reaches to the bottommost depth of the
being of the disciple. And remember, he is not doing anything, it simply happens. When the valley
is ready the waterfall happens of its own accord. The being of the master starts flowing towards the
disciple.
It is not something that the master is doing, it is not something the disciple is doing – nobody is
doing anything. The master is present to the disciple, and the disciple is present to the master, and
the phenomenon happens of its own accord. It is a jump of the flame of the master into the heart
of the disciple. But that needs to remain open, and the disciple needs to remain empty – just the
receiving end.
That’s why I say again and again that the art of disciplehood is the art of being a feminine
consciousness: receptive, allowing, not creating barriers, not closing doors, not trying to be safe
and secure. Trusting.
Trust is the word. And in trust, truth happens. To trust is to be ready to learn. Yes, trust is the word.
To trust is to be a disciple.

if you are still thinking, then you are still in control. You have not surrendered. If you are still saying
this is right and that is not right, then your mind is there, then you belong to the second part of
humanity, not to the third.
Now, let me divide these three parts again from a different direction.

Sunday 24 July 2011

Prof. Syed Ahmad Saeed Hamadani (1)

Prof. Syed Ahmad Saeed Hamadani (1)

There is a beautiful parable in Dostoyevsky’s BROTHERS’ KARAMAZOV.


Jesus comes back to the world after eighteen hundred years to see how things are going now. He
is ver y hopeful. He thinks, ’Now almost half the earth is Christian, now I am going to be welcomed
and received. The first time I was there on the earth people were against me because there were no
Christians, there was nobody to receive me. There were Jews, and they killed me.’ Now he comes
with great hope. He descends into Bethlehem on a Sunday morning. Naturally he chooses Sunday
– Christians will be free and they will be coming out of the church and he will meet them just in front
of the church

People are coming out and he is waiting with great hope. Then people come around him and they
start laughing, they start ridiculing him. They say, ’You are pretending perfectly well. You look just
like Jesus.’
And he says, ’I am Jesus!’
And they laugh and they say, ’Jesus is only one. This is sacrilege to call yourself Jesus. You look
like him, but how can you be him? It will be better if you escape from here before the priest comes
out. If he catches hold of you, you will be in trouble.’
But Jesus says, ’He is my priest. If you cannot recognise me, it’s okay – you are lay people. But

he is my priest, continuously reading my scriptures, thinking, meditating on whatsoever I have said
before, continuously talking about me. At least he will recognise me. You wait!’
And they laugh and they say, ’You are wrong. You just escape from here, otherwise you will get into
trouble.’
Then comes the priest, and the people who have not even bowed down to Jesus touch the feet of
the priest and give him a passage very reverently, very respectfully. And the priest comes in and
looks at this young man and says, ’You get down! You come follow me, you come into the church.
Have you gone mad? What are you up to?’
And Jesus says. ’Can’t you recognize me?’
Then the priest takes him into the church, puts him into a dark cell, locks the cell and disappears. In
the middle of the night he comes back. The whole day Jesus thinks, ’What is going to happen? Am
I going to be crucified again by my own people, by Christians? This is too much!’ He cannot believe
it.
In the middle of the night the priest comes with a small lamp in his hand. He falls at the feet of Jesus
and says, ’I recognised you. But please, you are not needed at all. You have done your work and we
are doing your work perfectly well. You are a great disturber. If you come again you will disturb the
whole thing. It has been hard wor k for us. For eighteen centuries we have struggled, and somehow
we have tried to manage things perfectly well. Half of humanity is converted and half is on the way.
You just wait. You need not come! Master, you are not needed, we servants are enough. You just
send messages from there.’
Jesus says, ’I’m happy that you at least recognised me.’

The pr iest says, ’Yes, I can recognise you when we are alone but in front of the masses I cannot
recognise you. And if you insist on creating trouble then I am sorry but I will have to crucify you the
same way that the Jews did with you – because a priest has to look to the establishment. I am part
of an establishment – Jewish or Christian does not matter. I have to save the Church. If there is any
conflict between you and the Church, then I am for the Church – I serve the Church. It is perfectly
good. You live in heaven, you enjoy there and we are enjoying here. Things are perfectly good.
There is no need of your second coming, the first was enough.’

The essential religion will always go against the established religion. Sufis are the very heart, but
the heart is bound to be against the mind, the intellect. The priest lives in the head; the man of
prayer lives in the heart. They are two polarities, their languages are different. Their languages
are so different that the priest cannot understand the language of the heart at all. He can spin
theories; he has great expertise as far as doctrines are concerned. He has a very legal mind and is
very knowledgeable. But as far as the heart is concerned there is a wasteland in his heart; nothing
grows, nothing flowers, nothing flows.




Discus SUFISIM

Truth is not a tradition. It cannot be, because truth is never old. It is eter nally new, it is eternally fresh, as fresh as the dewdrops in the mor ning or the stars in the night.
The claim of tradition is basically anti-truth. The word ‘tradition’ comes from a root ‘tradere’. It
means ‘handed by someone to somebody else, transferred’. From ‘tradere’ also comes the word
‘trade’. Tr uth cannot be transferred from one person to another person. It is impossible to transfer it. It is not a thing, hence it is not transferable. It cannot be traded, nobody can give it, nobody can take it. It ar ises in each individual’s own being, it is a flowering of your own heart.A Sufi need not be a Mohammedan. A Sufi can exist anywhere, in any form – because Sufism is the essential core of all religions. It has nothing to do with Islam in particular. Sufism can exist without Islam; Islam cannot exist without Sufism. Without Sufism, Islam is a corpse. Only with Sufism does it become alive.
Whenever a religion is alive it is because of Sufism. Sufism simply means a love affair with God, with the ultimate, a love affair with the whole. It means that one is ready to dissolve into the whole, that
one is ready to invite the whole to come into one’s hear t. It knows no for mality. It is not confined by any dogma, doctr ine, creed or church. Christ is a Sufi, so is Mohammed. Krishna is a Sufi, so is Buddha. This is the first thing I would like you to remember : that Sufism is the inner most core – as Zen is, as Hassidism is. These are only different names of the same ultimate relationship with God.

Thursday 21 July 2011

Meditation and Brain Rot By: Amrito MD


Meditation and Brain Rot 

By: Amrito MD
     
RECENT RESEARCH HAS NOW ESTABLISHED that thinking  too much can rot the brain. What they have yet to discover is that meditation is the key to the "off" button.

The Economist puts it perfectly: "Just as hard labor leaves marks on the hands, hard thinking leaves marks on the brain."

And medical research has known for some time that the brain is a malleable organ: the brains of sportsmen look different from computer users.

In the 1960's, research at University of California at Berkeley showed that rats brought up in a stimulating environment had denser, more complex brains than those in boring environments. Even old rats put in a more interesting cage show the same changes in their brains, with more synaptic connections between the cells supporting the old adage of "use it or lose it."

Not only do the brain cells increase, but the blood supply which brings the needed energy sources increase too. So, not only do "young interested rats develop 20-25 more synapses per nerve cell than do their bored contemporaries," but also they have "80% more capillaries" to supply the energy-bearing blood.

Recent research by William Greenough and his colleagues at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign subjected three sets of rats --"acrobats," "jocks," and "couch potatoes" to different environments--with the acrobats challenged by tasks that required coordination, the jocks just challenged physically, and the couch potatoes not challenged at all. The acrobats showed dramatic changes to the parts of the brain involved with coordination.

But what about overdoing it? It is also known that thinking too much can kill brain cells. It appears that chemicals excreted by thinking cells may not be cleared away quickly enough and may poison and kill the brain cells.

When Ruben Gur at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia asked men he was studying to relax, they could not -- their brains kept banging away at whatever they had been doing before without their being aware of it. Essentially this means, like all non-meditators, they were unaware of their thinking.

By contrast, women shifted to thinking about something completely different, using a different part of their brain. This difference, he believes, may explain his other main finding, which is that men's brains rot a lot faster than women's. Despite their big head start, by the age of 45, with their attention span and memory failing, the front of the men's brains which is responsible for "complex thinking" has shrunk to same size as "the frontal lobes of women of the same age." Alzheimer Lite all round for the boys.

So, not surprisingly, the brain works very much like the rest of our biological system. Rest between periods of exertion -- is the natural way of functioning. Lack of rest will cause over-training in athletes and reduce their function...the same is obviously true of the brain. And there is an intriguing relationship between awareness of breath and the fatigue that precedes heart attacks in stressed patients, over-training in athletes, and the chronic fatigue syndrome in others.... And while at least the athletes muscles rest while he or she sleeps, our multimedia brains do not. They switch over to a picture show called dreams, which in stressed, tense people can be quite a horror show.

Similarly it is not surprising that other investigators are increasingly recognizing a connection between alertness and function on the one hand, and relaxation on the other.

The key  is the ability to relax the brain -- which means allowing the mind to stop and rest. The first essential step is to become aware of our thoughts. This is the knack of meditation. Then you can experience a real surprise. 

Thinkers Meditation



For all activity , two things are required,  personality(you) and the  environment upon which you acts,it is normal procedure.You operate the nature and explore it but you don't explore to himself.Who are you?You ultimately know himself?Here we will explore himself(inner truth) and nature(outer truth) with two techniques, Thinker's and meditative techniques.Truth (ultimately knowing)can't be achieved form books, ideologies(all taught from society) , it comes from your own experience. 
Man is both the inner and the outer, and it has been a fallacy, a very ancient fallacy, to condemn one in favor of the other.
In the East, people renounce the outer in favor of the inner. They escape from the world into the caves in the Himalayas so that they can devote their whole life and their whole time and their whole energy to the inner journey -- but they don't understand the
dialectics of life. In the West, just the opposite has been done. They have renounced the inner so that they can put their whole energy into the outer world and the conquest of the outer world.Both have been wrong, and both have been right.
Both have been wrong because both remained halves; one part grew bigger and bigger, and the other part remained retarded. You can see it. In the East there is so much poverty, so much disease, so much sickness, so much death.Still, there is a certain contentment. With all this, there seems to be no revolutionary approach that "We should change the whole world. We cannot go on living in this poverty, and we have lived in this poverty for centuries, in slavery for centuries. And we have accepted everything -- poverty, slavery, disease, death -- without any resistance, because these are outer things. Our whole effort has been inner."
              In the West they have destroyed poverty, they have destroyed much disease, they have made man's life longer. They have made man's body more beautiful, they have made man's existence more comfortable, but the man himself -- for whom all these comforts, all these conquests of science and technology have been done -- is missing. They have completely forgotten for whom it was done. The inside is hollow. Everything is there, all around, and in the middle there is a retarded consciousness, almost non-existential.
So both have succeeded in what they were doing, and both have failed -- because they
have chosen only half of man's life.My attitude is that of accepting man in his totality, in his wholeness. And it has to be understood that once you accept the totality of man, you have to understand the law of dialectics

For example, the whole day you work hard -- in the fields, in the garden -- you perspire.In the night you will have a beautiful sleep. Don't think that because the whole day you have been working so hard, how can you sleep in the night? -- it is so against your whole day's work. It is not against. The whole day's hard work has prepared you to relax; the night will be deep relaxation.Beggars sleep the best. Emperors cannot sleep because the emperor has forgotten the dialectics of life. You need two legs to walk, you need two hands, you need two hemispheres in your brain. 
It has now become an accepted psychological truth that you can do hard mathematical 
work -- because it is done by one part of the mind -- and then you can do the same hard work on your musical instrument, and because it is done by another part of the mind, it is not continuous labor. In fact, when you are working hard on mathematics, the musical part of your mind is resting; and when you are working hard on the musical part, your mathematical mind is resting. In the universities, in the colleges all over the world, we change the class period every forty minutes because it has been found that after each forty minutes, the part that you 
have been working with gets tired. Just change the subject; that part goes into rest. Sitting with me, fill your cup with as much juice as possible. Feel silence to its uttermost depth, so that you can shout from the housetops. 
And there is no contradiction: your shouting from the housetops is simply part of a dialectical process. Your silence and your shouting are just like two hands, your two legs, your day and night, your work and rest period. Don't divide them as antagonistic to each other; that's how the whole world has suffered. The East has created great geniuses, but we are still living in the bullock cart age because our geniuses simply meditated. Their meditation never came into action. If they had meditated for a few hours and used their silence and peace and meditativeness for scientific research, this country would have been the richest in the world -- outer and 
inner, both. The same is true about the West: they created great geniuses, but they were all involved with things, objects. They forgot themselves completely. Once in a while a genius remembered, but it was too late. Albert Einstein, at the time of death, said his last words -- and remember, the last words are the most important a person has ever spoken in his life, because they are a conclusion, the essential experience. His last words were, "If there is another life, I would like to be a plumber. I don't want to be a physicist. I want to be something very simple -- a plumber." A tired brain, a burned brain... and what was his achievement? -- Hiroshima and 
Nagasaki. This man was capable of becoming a Gautam Buddha. If he had looked inwards, he had such an insight that perhaps he would have gone deeper than any Gautam Buddha, because he looked towards the stars and went further than any astronomer has ever done. It is the same power; it is only a question of direction. But why get fixed? Why not keep yourself available to both dimensions? What is the need of getting fixed? -- "I can only see outwardly, I cannot see inwardly, or vice-versa." One should only learn how to see deeply, and then use that insight in both dimensions. Then he can give better science and better technology to the world and he can give better human beings, a better humanity, at the same time. And remember, only in a better human being's hands is a better technology right; otherwise, it is dangerous. The East is dying with poverty. The West is dying with power. Strange.... They have created so much power that they can only kill. They don't know anything about life because they have never looked in. The East knows everything about life, but without food you cannot meditate. When you 
are hungry and you close your eyes, you can see only chappattis just floating all around. It has happened in the life of a poet, Heinrich Heine. He was lost in a jungle for three days, hungry, tired. Out of fear, he could not sleep; wild animals were staying in the tops of the trees in the night. And for three days continuously he did not come across a single human being to ask whether he was moving right or wrong, where he was going or if he was moving in a roundabout. Three days continuously... and then came the full moon night. Hungry, tired, hanging onto a tree, he looked at the full moon. He was a great poet, and he was surprised, he could not believe it. He himself had written about the moon, he had read about the moon. So much is written about the moon -- so much poetry, so much painting, so much art is around the moon. But Heinrich Heine had a revelation: before, he used to see his beloved's face in the moon; today he saw only a bread floating in the sky. He tried hard, but the beloved's face did not appear. It is perfectly good to be dialectical. And always remember to try the opposites as complementaries. Use all the opposites as complementaries and your life will be fuller, your life will be whole. To me, this is the only holy life: a whole life is the only holy life.

Saturday 16 July 2011

Process To Know Truth: Science and the Inner Journey(OSHO)

Process To Know Truth: Science and the Inner Journey(OSHO)

Science and the Inner Journey(OSHO)

OSHO

What is basic thing MATTER or SOUL(GOD,gods etc) PART I

My Beloved Ones,
All thinking or ideology can be categorized into two classes, Materialism and Idealism. But what's mean by these two words.Here we will look upon these two philosophical  ideologies .    
 Materialism holds that the only thing that exists is matter; that all things are composed of material and all phenomena (including consciousness) are the result of material interactions. In other words, matter is the only substance. To many philosophers, not only is 'physicalism' synonymous with 'materialism', but they use both words to describe a position that supports ideas from physics which may not be matter in the traditional sense (like anti-matter or gravity).[1] Therefore much of the generally philosophical discussion below on materialism may be relevant to physicalism. Also related are the ideas of methodological naturalism (i.e. "let's at least do science as though physicalism is true") and metaphysical naturalism (i.e. "philosophy and science should operate according to the physical world, and that's all that exists"). The philosophical alternatives to materialism are some forms of monism (besides the materialistic monism), dualism and idealism.
Materialism is "a theory that physical matter is the only or fundamental reality."
Lennon the leader and the founder of Soviet Union revolution defines dialectical materialism as     
matter is that existence which   do not depends upon consciousness for his existence, it exists independently from consciousness . he says it is the philosophical definition of materialism , what is the form of matter, it is the job of scientist to explore. He says  consciousness depends upon matter for existence.it evolves from matter.  
Question in this definition he accept that there is something which he call's consciousness. when you say that a thing 'X' is that which don't depends upon another thing 'Y'(consciousness), you accept that 'X' and 'Y' are two different things which you can not consider under one definition.He says that 'Y' evolves form 'X' ,the 'Y'' will be also 
some form of 'X'. philosophically it is contradicted.   

The Center of you, for inner knowing

My Beloved Ones,

The first thing: the soul has a connection with the body at some centers – our life energy comes
from these connections. The soul is closely related to these centers; from them our life energy flows
into the body.
The seeker who is not aware of these centers will never be able to attain to the soul. If I ask you
which is the most impor tant center, which is the most impor tant place in your body, you will probably
point to your head.
Man’s ver y wrong education has made the head the most impor tant par t of the human body. The
head or brain is not the most impor tant center of life-energy in man. It is like going to a plant and
asking it what its most impor tant and vital par t is. Because the flowers can be seen at the top of the
plant, the plant and ever ybody else will say that the flowers are the most impor tant par t. So although
the flowers seem to be the most impor tant they are not, the most impor tant par t are the roots, which
are not visible.
The brain is the flower on the plant of man, it is not the root. Roots come first; flowers come last. If
the roots are ignored the flowers will wither away because they have no separate life of their own. If
the roots are taken care of, the flowers get taken care of automatically; no special effor t is needed
to care for them. But looking at a plant it seems that the flowers are the most impor tant par t and in
the same way it seems that, in man, the brain is most impor tant. The brain is the final development
in man’s body; it is not the root.

If we ask somebody which is the most impor tant par t in a human body then unknowingly his hand
will point towards the head and he will say that the head is the most impor tant. Or, if it is a woman,
then maybe she will point towards her hear t and say that the hear t is the most impor tant.
Neither the head nor the hear t is the most impor tant. Men have emphasized their heads and
women have emphasized their hear ts. But by emphasizing these two par ts the society so for med is
continuously being r uined ever y day, because neither of these par ts are the most impor tant par t in
a human body. Both are ver y late developments. Man’s roots are not in them.
What do I mean by the roots of man? Just as the plants have roots in the ear th from which they
draw their life-energy and life juices and live, similar ly, in the human body, there are roots at some
point which draw life-energy from the soul. Because of this the body remains alive. The day those
roots become feeble, the body begins to die.

The roots of plants are in the ear th; the roots of the human body are in the soul. But neither the
head nor the hear t is the place from where man is connected to his life-energy – and if we do not
know anything about those roots then we can never enter the wor ld of a meditator.
Then where are the roots of man? Perhaps you are not aware of the place. If even simple and
common things are not given any attention for thousands of years, they are forgotten. A child is bor n
in the womb of a mother and grows there. Through which par t is the child connected to its mother?
Through the head or through the hear t? No, it is connected through the navel. The life-energy is
available to it through the navel – the hear t and the brain develop later on. The life-energy of the
mother becomes available to the child through the navel. The child is connected to his mother’s
body through his navel. From there the roots spread out into the mother’s body and also, in the
opposite direction, into his own body as well.
The most impor tant point in the human body is the navel. After that the hear t develops and after
that the brain. These are all branches which develop later. It is on them that the flowers blossom.

Flowers of knowledge blossom in the brain; flowers of love blossom in the hear t. It is these flowers
which allure us, and then we think that they are ever ything. But the roots of man’s body and his
life-energy are in the navel. No flowers blossom there. The roots are absolutely invisible, they are
not even seen. But the degeneration that has happened to human life in the past five thousand
years is because we have placed all our emphasis either on the brain or on the hear t. Even on the
hear t we have placed ver y little emphasis; most of the emphasis has gone to the brain.
From ear ly childhood, all education is an education of the brain; there is no education of the navel
anywhere in the wor ld. All education is of the brain so the brain goes on growing larger and larger
and our roots go on becoming smaller and smaller. We take care of the brain because the flowers
blossom there, so it becomes larger – and our roots go on disappear ing. Then the life-energy flows
more and more feebly and our contact with the soul becomes weak.
Slowly, slowly we have even come to a point where man is saying, ”Where is the soul? Who says
there is a soul? Who says there is a God? We do not find anything.” We will not find anything. One
cannot find anything. If somebody searches all over the body of the tree and says, ”Where are the
roots? I cannot find anything,” then what he is saying is r ight. There are no roots anywhere on the
tree. And we have no access to the place where the roots are; of that place we have no awareness.
From ear ly childhood, all training, all education is of the brain, of the mind, so our whole attention
gets entangled and ends up focused on the brain. Then for our whole life we wander around the
brain. Our awareness does not ever go below it.
The jour ney of a meditator is downwards – towards the roots. One has to descend from the brain
to the hear t, and from the hear t to the navel. Only from the navel can anybody enter into the soul;
before that, one can never enter it.
Nor mally the movement of our life is from the navel towards the brain. The movement of a seeker is
exactly opposite. He has to descend from the brain to the navel.

Matirailism